MALAYSIA'S EXPERIENCES ON CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT AND TIMBER CERTIFICATION
ABSTRACT
At the end of 1998, Malaysia had an estimated
19.01 million hectares of forests covering 57.9% of its total land
area. Of this total, 14.33 million hectares have been designated as the
Permanent Forest Estate (PFE) under sustainable management, while 2.12
million hectares are protected by legislation for conservation purposes.
The Dipterocarp Forest of the PFE is
selectively harvested in accordance with the prescribed silvicultural
practices of promoting natural regeneration, while the Mangrove Forest
is clear-felled.
In 1994, Malaysia had formulated a total of 92
and 84 activities to operationalize the ITTO's "Criteria for the
Measurement of Sustainable Tropical Forest Management" at the national
and the forest management unit levels respectively. Moreover,
Peninsular Malaysia had also formulated management specifications at
both these levels to ensure effective monitoring and evaluation.
For the purpose of forest management
certification, Peninsular Malaysia had taken a sub-set of 6 criteria,
28 indicators, 71 activities and 164 management specifications
(MC&I) from those formulated at the forest management unit
level. These were used to certify three forest management units in
Peninsular Malaysia in mid-1996. A forest certification exercise was
also conducted in the Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah which was
certified to be a "well-managed forest".
In 1999, Malaysia had revised the MC&I in
accordance with the new ITTO document on "Criteria and Indicators for
Sustainable Management of Natural Tropical Forests" and its two Manuals
for its application. This revised MC&I would be used in future
forest management certification in Malaysia and will be refined
periodically to reflect new concepts of sustainable forest management.
1.0INTRODUCTION
1.1Malaysia is a tropical country located north of the Equator within latitudes
1° to 7° North and longitudes 100° to 119° East. The total land area is
approximately 32.8 million hectares with 13.1 million hectares in Peninsular
Malaysia, which comprises eleven states and the Federal Territory of Kuala
Lumpur, 7.4 million hectares in Sabah and the Federal Territory of Labuan,
and 12.3 million hectares in Sarawak. Peninsular Malaysia is separated
from Sabah and Sarawak by 720 km of the South China Sea, giving the country
a coastline of almost 4,830 km.
1.2The climate of Malaysia is typically humid tropical or wet equatorial
and is characterized by year round high temperatures and seasonal heavy
rain, especially during the North-East Monsoon from October/November to
February/March. The mean temperatures during the day and night are 32°C
and 22°C respectively. The average monthly temperature variation is about
2°C while diurnal temperature variation for inland and coastal areas are
8.5°C to 11°C and 5.5°C to 8.5°C respectively. The average annual rainfall
is about 2,540 mm with a maximum of 5,080 mm and a minimum of 1,650 mm. Humidity
is always high and ranges from 70% to 98% and the sky is cloudy most of
the day, especially during the monsoon months.
1.3In Malaysia, the forest has contributed significantly towards its socio-economic
development. This can be highlighted as follows:-
(i)in 1998, the forestry sector accounted for about 3% of the country's Gross Domestic Product of US$35.2 billion;
(ii)the total export of timber and timber
products in 1998 was valued at US$3.7 billion or 5.0% of the country's
total export earnings at f.o.b US$75.5 billion;
(iii)in 1998, the total forest revenue
collected by the various states in Malaysia amounted to US$368.8
million based on a production of 21.7 million m3 of roundlogs; and
(iv)the forestry sector also provided direct
employment for 254,494 people in 1998 or about 3% of the country's
labour force of 8.9 million.
2.0CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
2.1Under Article 74 (2) of the Malaysian Constitution, forestry comes under
the jurisdiction of the respective State Governments. As such, each state
is empowered to enact laws on forestry and to formulate forestry policy
independently. The executive authority of the Federal Government only extends
to the provision of advice and technical assistance to the states, training,
the conduct of research and in the maintenance of experimental and demonstration
stations.
2.2In order to facilitate the adoption of a co-ordinated and common approach
to forestry, the National Forestry Council (NFC) comprising the Chief Ministers
of the thirteen Malaysian States and chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister,
was established on 20 December, 1971 by the National Land Council (NLC). The
NLC is empowered under the Malaysian Constitution to formulate a national
policy for the promotion and control of utilization of land for mining,
agriculture and forestry. The NFC serves as a forum for the Federal and
the State Governments to discuss and resolve common problems and issues
relating to forestry policy, administration and management. All the decisions
of the NFC have to be endorsed by the NLC. The responsibility for implementing
the decisions of the NFC lies with the State Governments unless it is within
the authority of the Federal Government.
3.0FOREST RESOURCES
3.1At the end of 1998, the total area of forests in Malaysia was estimated
to be 19.01 million hectares or 57.9% of the total land area, with the
proportion of forested land being higher in Sabah and Sarawak than in Peninsular
Malaysia, which is more developed as shown in Table 1 of Appendix 1.
3.2Of the total forested area and recognizing the crucial role of forests
is not only in the production of timber, but more importantly in the conservation
of soil, water and wildlife, as well as in the protection of the environment,
Malaysia has a total of 14.33 million hectares of forested land designated
as the Permanent Forest Estate (PFE) which is under sustainable management. Approximately
10.84 million hectares of the PFE are production forests with the remaining
3.49 million hectares being protection forests. The status of the PFE in
Malaysia is summarized as in Table 2 of Appendix 1.
3.3Malaysia also has 4.81 million hectares of agricultural tree crops which
are mainly rubber, oil palm, coconut and cocoa. These agricultural plantations
are similar to reafforested land and increasingly these crops can be looked
upon as alternative sources of wood supply especially that of rubberwood. Hence,
at the end of 1998 the total area under tree cover in Malaysia was estimated
to be 23.82 million hectares or 72.6% of its total land area.
3.4Since the 1930s, Malaysia has been establishing a network of protected
areas for the conservation of biological diversity. Currently, Malaysia
has 2.12 million hectares of conservation areas protected by legislation
as shown in Table 3 of Appendix 1. Of these, 1.80 million hectares are
located outside the PFE, whilst another 0.32 million hectares are located
within the Estate.
3.5In its efforts to further conserve various forest and ecological types
in their original conditions, the Forestry Departments have also set aside
pockets of virgin forest. These pockets, known as Virgin Jungle Reserves
(VJRs), were established to serve as permanent nature reserves and natural
arboreta, as controls for comparing harvested and silviculturally treated
forests and as undisturbed natural forests for general ecological and botanical
studies. Since its inception in the 1950s, a total of 83 VJRs covering
21,506 hectares were established throughout Peninsular Malaysia while in
the state of Sabah, a total of 48 VJRs had also been established covering
an area of 90,442 hectares. These VJRs represent samples of the many types
of virgin forest found in the country which are located in the PFE. Represented
forest types include Mangrove Forest, Heath Forest, Peat Swamp Forest,
Lowland Dipterocarp Forest, Hill Dipterocarp Forest, Upper Dipterocarp
Forest and Montane Forest.
3.6Hence, with the protection forests of the PFE of 3.49 million hectares,
the totally protected areas designated for the conservation of biological
diversity in Malaysia are now estimated to be 5.29 million hectares or
27.8% of its total forested land.
4.0FOREST MANAGEMENT
4.1Since the establishment of the Forestry Department in 1901, the forests
in Malaysia have been systematically managed. Over the years, ecologically
and environmentally-sound forest conservation and management practices
have been developed to ensure that the forest resources in Malaysia are
managed for the sustainable production of timber and non-timber products,
in enhancing climatic stability and ecological balance, the safeguarding
of water supplies and environmental quality, and in the conservation of
biological diversity.
4.2In Peninsular Malaysia, the Dipterocarp Forest of the production forest
of the PFE is managed under two management systems, namely the Modified
Malayan Uniform System (55-year cutting cycle) and the Selective Management
System (30-year cutting cycle). In brief, the Modified Malayan Uniform
System consists of removing the mature crop in one single felling of all
trees down to 45 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) for all species while
the Selective Management System (SMS) entails the selection of optimum
management (felling) regimes based on pre-felling forest inventory data.
4.3Under the SMS, the cutting limit prescribed for the group of dipterocarp
species would not be less than 50 cm dbh, except for Neobalanocarpus heimii
(Chengal) where the cutting limit would be above 60 cm dbh, while the cutting
limit prescribed for the group of non-dipterocarp species would not be
less than 45 cm dbh. The difference in the cutting limits prescribed between
the dipterocarp species and that of the non-dipterocarp species would be
at least 5 cm in order to conserve a higher percentage of dipterocarp species
for the next cut.
4.4In pursuance of sound management objectives, forest harvesting in the
state of Sabah is undertaken in accordance with the prescribed silvicultural
practices of promoting the development of natural regeneration. In this
context, the Dipterocarp Forest in the state of Sabah is selectively harvested
on a 50-year cutting cycle and only trees having size of 60 cm dbh and
above are removed.
4.5In the state of Sarawak, the cutting cycle prescribed for the Dipterocarp
Forest is 25 years with the prescribed cutting limits for the dipterocarp
and non-dipterocarp species being 60 cm dbh and 45 cm dbh and above respectively.
4.6Currently, the Peat Swamp Forest in Peninsular Malaysia is managed under
the "modified" SMS where higher cutting limits are prescribed
due to a lower stocking of natural regeneration in the stand. Research
and development efforts are currently being taken to formulate more effective
management system for this forest type. In this regard, the cutting cycle
adopted for the Peat Swamp Forest in the state of Sarawak is 45 years with
the prescribed cutting limits for Gonystylus bancanus (Ramin) and that
of the other species being 40 cm dbh and 45 cm dbh and above, respectively.
4.7The Mangrove Forest, in general, is managed under cutting cycles varying
between 20 to 30 years. However, currently there is no harvesting of mangrove
forests in the states of Sabah and Sarawak, while in Peninsular Malaysia
mature trees are clear-felled with the retention of seven mother trees
per hectare and a three meter wide river bank and coastal strip for ensuring
adequate natural regeneration and in the protection of the environment.
4.8In fact, the forest management objectives are clearly enunciated in
the National Forestry Policy which was formulated and approved by the NFC
and later endorsed by the NLC on 19 April, 1978. This Policy is being implemented
by all the states in Peninsular Malaysia, while the objectives of the Policy
are also being implemented in Sabah. In the state of Sarawak, the Forest
Policy which was approved by the Governor-in-Council in 1954 and having
very similar provisions to the National Forestry Policy has remained the
basis for forestry practices. However, with the recent concern by the world
community on the importance of biological diversity conservation and the
sustainable utilization of genetic resources, as well as the role of local
communities in forest development, the National Forestry Policy was revised
in 1992 to include these important aspects of forestry. The salient features
of the National Forestry Policy, 1978 (Revised 1992) are as shown in Appendix
2.
4.9Besides, various forest enactments and rules that were formulated and
enforced by the respective state authorities since the early 1900s were
found to be deficient and weak in areas of forest protection, management
and planning, as well as in forest renewal operations which are vital to
sustainable management and in the protection of environmental stability
and ecological balance. To overcome these shortcomings and to ensure the
effective implementation of the National Forestry Policy, the NFC agreed
to review, up-date and uniformize the existing State Forest Enactments,
especially in Peninsular Malaysia. Hence, a National Forestry Act was formulated
and passed by an Act of Parliament in October, 1984. This Act is now being
enforced by all the State Forestry Departments in Peninsular Malaysia. However,
to further strengthen its provisions to safeguard and protect the forest
resources from illegal logging, the Act was amended in 1993.
4.10In this context, the penalty for the commission of any forest offence
has been increased from the maximum penalty of US$2,630 or an imprisonment
for a term not exceeding three years or both to a maximum penalty of US$131,580
and an imprisonment not exceeding 20 years with a mandatory imprisonment
of at least one year. The amended National Forestry Act has also enacted
provisions for the Police and Armed Forces to undertake surveillance of
forestry activities, especially in curbing illegal logging, encroachment
of forest areas and timber theft.
4.11Furthermore, under section 10 (1) of the National Forestry Act, 1984,
all the State Forestry Departments in Peninsular Malaysia have also reclassified
the PFE into one or more of the following functional classes through a
combination of slope and elevation classes:-
(i)timber production forest under sustained yield;
(ii)soil protection forest;
(iii)soil reclamation forest;
(iv)flood control forest;
(v)water catchment forest;
(vi)forest sanctuary for wildlife;
(vii)virgin jungle reserved forest;
(viii)amenity forest;
(ix)education forest;
(x)research forest; and
(xi)forest for federal purposes.
5.0FOREST HARVESTING
5.1Forest harvesting in the inland forest in Malaysia is generally carried
out by a combination of crawler tractor-winch lorry. Under this harvesting
system the crawler tractor skids the logs from the felling sites to the
skid trails where the winch lorry continues the transportation to the roadside
landings. In Malaysia, the skidder generally does not pick up its load
from the felling site because of adverse soil and terrain conditions. Currently,
reduced impact logging (ground skidding) is also being carried out in some
forest areas in Peninsular Malaysia and in the state of Sabah, while low
impact logging (helicopter logging) is being carried out in the state of
Sarawak.
5.2Currently, it has been estimated that the costs of extraction of logs
to log landing under helicopter logging range from US$50 – 60/m3,
while that for conventional tractor logging is estimated to be US$10 –
13/m3. Although the cost of helicopter logging is relatively much higher
than the conventional crawler tractor-winch lorry system, the harvesting
damage to surrounding trees is found to be 3.8 times lower than the conventional
system. Land erosion resulting from forest road construction is also minimized
as a result of the 3 km flying range of the helicopter as compared to the
optimum skidding distance of 1 km for the tractor.
5.3To further mitigate the adverse effects of forest harvesting, the Forestry
Departments have also adopted "Standard Road Specifications"
and "Forest Harvesting Guidelines" for strict adherence by all
logging contractors both at the planning and implementation levels, especially
in Peninsular Malaysia. All harvesting operations have to be carried out
in accordance with these specifications and guidelines, particularly those
pertaining to road construction, alignment, gradient, drainage, tree marking,
direction of felling and the setting up of log-yards. The departments'
role is to supervise closely the implementation of the environmental conservation
measures such as the choice of machinery, construction of water bars and
the control of pollution of rivers and waterbodies resulting from logging. The
forest engineers of the Forestry Departments play an active role in providing
technical advice and services on all matters pertaining to infrastructural
development of the logging sector such as the design and construction of
forest roads so as to enhance environmental stability and quality.
6.0FORMULATION OF CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
(a)Overview
6.1Malaysia as a producing member country of the International Tropical
Timber Organization (ITTO) is fully committed to achieve sustainable forest
management in the overall context of sustainable development. In 1994,
Malaysia had taken action to elaborate and operationalize the ITTO's Guidelines
for the Sustainable Management of Natural Tropical Forests and its Criteria
for the Measurement of Sustainable Tropical Forest Management in managing
its natural forest and to ensure it is sustainably managed by the year
2000. Implicit to this commitment is the acceptance of the ITTO definition
on sustainable forest management which is defined as a process of managing
permanent forest land to achieve one or more clearly specified objectives
of management with regard to the production of a continuous flow of desired
forest products and services without undue reduction of its inherent values
and future productivity, and without undue undesirable effects on the physical
and social environment.
6.2In this connection, a National Committee on Sustainable Forest Management
in Malaysia comprising representatives from the Ministry of Primary Industries,
Malaysia; the Forestry Departments of Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak;
the Forest Research Institute, Malaysia; the Malaysian Timber Industry
Board; the Malaysian Timber Council and the Faculty of Forestry, University
Putra, Malaysia was established in February 1994 at the Ministry to ensure
that the elaborated ITTO's Criteria for the Measurement of Sustainable
Tropical Forest Management in the Malaysian context are fully implemented. To
further support the Committee's work, the ten State Forestry Departments
in Peninsular Malaysia had also formed a Working Party on Sustainable Natural
Forest Management, Peninsular Malaysia at the Forestry Department Headquarters,
Peninsular Malaysia in February, 1994.
(b)National Level
6.3After a series of meetings, the Committee had formulated a total of
92 activities to operationalize the ITTO's 5 criteria and 27 indicators
on sustainable forest management at the national level, covering the forest
resource base, continuity of flow, level of environmental control, socio-economic
effects and institutional framework; as well as management specifications
for each activity, to ensure its effective monitoring and evaluation in
the field. A summary of the number of criteria, indicators, activities
and management specifications formulated at the national level is as shown
in Appendix 3.
6.4In the process, the Committee had added two additional indicators, while
omitting two of the proposed ITTO's indicators. The two additional indicators
were the indicator on Plantation Establishment of Non-wood Forest Produce
and Annual Planting Targets under the ITTO's criterion on the Forest Resource
Base and the indicator on Expenditure Budgets for Forest Administration
under the ITTO's criterion on Socio-Economic Effects. The reason for omitting
the ITTO's indicator on Availability of Environmental Assessment Procedures
under the criterion Socio-Economic Effects was that this indicator was
also included under the criterion on the Level of Environmental Control
which the Committee deemed to be more appropriate, while the omission of
the indicator on the Relationship of National Policy to ITTO Guidelines
under the criterion on Institutional Frameworks was that the National Forestry
Policy of Malaysia had adequately met the objectives of the ITTO guidelines
in terms of sustainable forest management.
(c)Forest Management Unit Level
6.5For the purpose of this paper, a Forest Management Unit is defined as
an area of forest land that is managed by an organizational entity which
decides on and subsequently implements forest activities to ensure the
economic, ecological, biological and socio-cultural sustainability of the
area. The area being managed may be owned by an individual or several individuals
grouped together or by a community within a single administrative boundary,
all under a specific forest management plan within which forest activities
are regulated by a national or state forest service. The size of the unit
should be large enough to yield economic harvests in terms of public revenue
and private profits, and to provide for the conservation of key wildlife
species. In general, the unit consists of forest districts having a number
of forest reserves, which are further divided into compartments and sub-compartments
for the purpose of effective management, conservation and development of
the forest resources.
6.6Currently, each individual state, especially in Peninsular Malaysia,
is defined as a forest management unit in view of the following legal and
administrative requirements:-
(i)as mentioned earlier, under Article 74 (2)
of the Malaysian Constitution, forestry comes under the jurisdiction of
the respective State Governments. As such, each state is empowered to
enact laws on forestry and to formulate forestry policy
independently. The executive authority of the Federal Government only
extends to the provision of advice and technical assistance to the
states, training, the conduct of research and maintenance of
experimental and demonstration stations;
(ii)the implementation of Criteria, Indicators
and Activities, as well as Management Specifications are monitored
and evaluated at the state level by the Federal agencies and bodies,
such as the National Forestry Council;
(iii)all the decisions made with regard to the
implementation of forest management, conservation and development
activities in the state are carried out at the state level by
the respective State Authorities;
(iv)the allocation of Annual Allowable Cuts
(AACs) for the production forests of the PFE by the National Forestry
Council is determined on a state by state basis; and
(v)under section 4 of the National Forestry
Act, 1984, each Director of the State Forestry Department is
responsible to the State Authority for the preparation and
implementation of the State forest management plan, reforestation plan
and programmes relating to amenity forests.
6.7In this regard, the National Committee on Sustainable Forest Management
in Malaysia had identified a total of 84 activities to be implemented at
the forest management unit level under the 6 criteria of the ITTO and its
23 indicators, covering resource security, the continuity of timber production,
conservation of flora and fauna and other forest resources, an acceptable
level of environmental impact, socio-economic benefits, and planning and
adjustment to experience. In its development, the Committee had added 7
additional indicators from those identified at the national level to this
level which are as follows:-
(i)the length of cutting cycle;
(ii)areas of Protection Forests and Production Forests within the PFE;
(iii)establishment of forest plantations for wood production,
(iv)establishment of forest plantations for non-wood production;
(v)availability of environmental assessment procedures;
(vi)expenditure budgets for forest management; and
(vii)expenditure budgets for forest administration.
6.8Of the 84 activities identified for implementation on a state basis,
a total of 70 activities or 83% are identical to those identified at the
national level. Moreover, in Peninsular Malaysia, against each of the activities
identified at the national and forest management unit levels, the respective
State Forestry Departments had also formulated management specifications
(benchmarks) for its effective monitoring and evaluation. A total of 206
and 191 management specifications have been formulated at the national
and forest management unit levels respectively. Of the 191 management specifications
formulated at the forest management unit level, a total of 161 or 78% of
these specifications are identical to those formulated at the national
level. A summary of the number of criteria, indicators, activities and
management specifications formulated at the forest management unit level
is as shown in Appendix 4.
6.9Furthermore, in formulating the 92 activities and the 84 activities
for implementation at the national and forest management unit levels respectively,
the National Committee on Sustainable Forest Management in Malaysia had
reviewed the Principles and Criteria for Forest Management of the Forest
Stewardship Council and those of the Tropenwald Initiative, and had also
taken into account the Principles and Recommendations as enshrined in the
ITTO's Guidelines on the Conservation of Biological Diversity in Tropical
Production Forests.
7.0TIMBER CERTIFICATION
7.1Timber certification can be defined as a process which results in a
written certificate being produced by an independent third party attesting
to the location and management status of the forest in which the timber
originated.
7.2It involves two aspects which are namely:-
(i)forest management certification or forest
auditing which entails an independent assessment of a forest management
operation, according to specific economic, social, environmental and
ecological criteria, indicators, activities and management
specifications. This forest assessment typically includes an evaluation
of the economic viability of the operation, the social and
environmental impact of the forest management activities and the
ecological health of the forest. It covers forest inventory, management
planning, silviculture, harvesting, forest road construction and other
related forest management operations; and
(ii)product certification which entails the
tracking of forest produce throughout the entire production process,
from the forest to the shop-floor. This "chain-of-custody" involves
verifying the flow of forest produce from the stump in the forest,
through milling and manufacturing processes, to the finished
product. It includes log transportation, log storage, primary
processing, intermediate product transport and storage, various phases
of further processing, transport and distribution between them, and
finally distribution of end products to consumers.
7.3In the context of forest management certification, although Malaysia
believes that it should be consumer-driven, market-based and on a voluntary
basis; it also believes that to some extent government involvement is necessary
as currently all forest lands in Malaysia are owned by the government,
except for a few thousand hectares of plantation forests which are privately
owned. The involvement of the government is also necessitated by the financial
requirements of forest management certification schemes in view that most
of these schemes are yet to be self-financing.
7.4The advantages of government involvement in forest management certification
schemes are that the government is in a better position to ensure:-
(i)consistency of criteria and indicators applied;
(ii)balance the views of the different parties involved;
(iii)greater accountability to the public;
(iv)greater transparency in the schemes used; and
(v)an additional channel for presenting their interest to labelling authorities.
7.5Hence, the National Timber Certification Council, Malaysia (NTCC) was
incorporated as a company limited by guarantee in October, 1998. It is
a non-profit company managed by a Board of Trustees comprising a chairman
and two representatives each from academic or research and development
institutions, timber industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and
government agencies.
7.6The activities that are currently being undertaken by the NTCC, among
others, include the following:-
(i)development and implementation of a timber
certification system in Malaysia to ensure sustainable forest
management, as well as to facilitate the trade in timber from Malaysia;
(ii)development and implementation of training programmes in all aspects related to timber certification;
(iii)development and implementation of standards related to timber certification;
(iv)establishment and implementation of a
system to oversee and monitor the implementation of the certification
system, including appeal mechanisms;
(v)establishment of networks and cooperation
with national and international bodies related to timber certification
to facilitate cooperation and mutual recognition arrangements; and
(vi)collection, processing and dissemination of
data and information related to timber certification and sustainable
forest management.
7.7The criteria, indicators, activities and management specifications used
for undertaking forest management certification in Peninsular Malaysia
are a sub-set of those formulated for sustainable forest management at
the forest management unit level on a state basis. It encompasses 71 activities
and 164 management specifications under a total of 6 criteria and 28 indicators. A
summary of the number of criteria, indicators, activities and management
specifications is as shown in Appendix 5.
7.8The rationale for this is that forest management certification only
involves the sustainability of the PFE, especially its production forests. Hence,
the activities that had been omitted from those formulated for assessing
sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level are as
follows:-
(i)identify areas for forest plantation of wood and non-wood forest produce outside the PFE;
(ii)determine the optimum concession length;
(iii)harvest and replant the forest plantation;
(iv)project the level of wood production from
conversion forests, plantation forests and perennial agricultural tree
crops (rubberwood);
(v)establish forest plantations outside the PFE for wood and non-wood productions; and
(vi)report on the contributions in terms of forest revenue to the State Governments.
7.9The relationship and number of criteria, indicators, activities and
management specifications formulated at the national level and forest management
unit levels for sustainable forest management, as well as for forest management
certification at the forest management unit level are as shown in Appendix
6.
7.10This set of criteria, indicators activities and management specifications
for forest management certification was used for certifying three forest
management units in Peninsular Malaysia, namely, the states of Selangor,
Pahang and Terengganu, under the Malaysia-Netherlands Joint Working Group's
(JWG) Pilot Study on timber certification in mid-1996. The Malaysian Timber
Industry Board (MTIB) and the Netherlands Timber Trade Association (NTTA)
were the focal points for the Study. Under the initial planning, three
timber products, namely, sawn timber, plywood and mouldings would be subjected
to the certification process, following which the 'certified' timber products
would enter the Keurhout Hallmark System implemented in The Netherlands
to track these products to the final end-users. A third party, SGS (Societe
Generale de Surveillance) Malaysia, Sdn. Bhd., was appointed to undertake
the Study. Thus, the criteria used for the chain-of-custody assessment
were based on the SGS QUALIFOR Programme.
7.11At the first assessment of the three states in September, 1996, SGS
had found that all the three states had complied with most of the management
specifications. However, the assessment had also identified several areas
in which there was incomplete compliance against the Malaysian Criteria
and Indicators (MC&I) for forest management certification. In view
of this, 'Audit Statements' on forest management were issued to the three
State Forestry Departments. It was agreed that the Departments would demonstrate
continuous improvements to achieve full compliance with the requirements
of the MC&I for forest management certification by the year 2000.
7.12Surveillance visits to monitor further compliance with the MC&I
were carried out in the state of Selangor in May, 1998 and in Pahang in
June, while the visit to Terengganu took place in July and August, 1998.
7.13The report by SGS following the surveillance visits noted that forest
management had shown improvement since the initial audit, mainly with regard
to mapping, documentation, marking and monitoring of growth plots, development
of Virgin Jungle Reserves in each forest district, implementation of enrichment
planting in disturbed areas, and clear marking of buffer zones for permanent
rivers and streams. However, improvements in field operations such as road
construction and maintenance, reduced impact harvesting, maintenance of
water quality, environment assessment and monitoring had not been fully
addressed. However, in line with the phased approach, SGS issued new Audit
Statements for the three states.
7.14In this context, the first shipment of sawn timber arrived in Rotterdam
in January 1997. Up to 9 December, 1999, a total of 48,674m3 of sawn timber
had been shipped. As at 3 December, 1999, a total of 48 companies in Peninsular
Malaysia have been awarded Chain-of-Custody Certificates by SGS. A total
of 41 Dutch companies are involved in importing such 'audited' timber. In
fact, arrangements were made by the NTTA for the initial shipments of sawn
timber to be manufactured into products to be used in building projects
in various municipalities and local authorities which had restrictions
on the use of tropical timber. The response from these municipalities and
local authorities was found to be encouraging.
7.15In Sabah, a forest certification exercise was also conducted by SGS,
where the forest management model area in the Deramakot Forest Reserve
was certified as being a "well-managed forest". The management
concept and practices in Deramakot are in full compliance with the MC&I
and hence the ITTO's criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management.
8.0REVISION OF CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
8.1With the adoption of the new ITTO documents on Criteria and Indicators
for Sustainable Management of Natural Tropical Forests and the Manual for
the Application of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Management of
Natural Tropical Forests (Part A – National Indicators and Part
B – Forest Management Unit Indicators) at the 24th Session of
the International Tropical Timber Council (ITTC) held in May 1998 at Libreville,
Gabon and the 26th Session held in June, 1999 at Chiang Mai, Thailand respectively;
Malaysia had taken action to revise its MC&I which was formulated based
on the earlier guidelines of ITTO, and in particular, the ITTO's Criteria
for the Measurement of Sustainable Tropical Forest Management.
8.2The revision of the MC&I was co-ordinated by the NTCC through a
preliminary meeting among the Forestry Departments of Peninsular Malaysia,
Sabah and Sarawak in July, 1999 to agree on a common set of Criteria and
Indicators both at the national and forest management unit levels for sustainable
forest management for the whole country based on the ITTO's Criteria and
Indicators for Sustainable Management of Natural Tropical Forests, as well
as the Activities required to operationalize these criteria and indicators
which were based on the 'Action To Be Taken' as contained in the ITTO's
Manual for the Application of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Management
of Natural Tropical Forests (Parts A and B).
8.3This was followed by regional consultations with interested parties
to identify appropriate Standards of Performance for each of the Activities. These
consultations were conducted by the Forestry Departments of Peninsular
Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak in their respective regions in August, 1999. In
the case of Peninsular Malaysia it entails the refinement and/or addition
to the Management Specifications of the MC&I formulated earlier in
1994. These regional Standards of Performance were then integrated into
the draft MC&I for the whole country through a meeting held between
the three Forestry Departments of Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak
which was co-ordinated by the NTCC in September, 1999.
8.4The draft MC&I was then tabled at the national-level consultation
held in October, 1999 where a total of 85 organizations and companies,
representing interested parties such as the timber industry, social and
environmental non-governmental organizations, trade unions, women's organization,
academic/research institutions and government agencies, were invited to
attend. In this regard, a total of 111 participants representing 58 organizations,
including two representatives from the Forest Stewardship Council participated. Through
this open and transparent process, Malaysia had adopted a set of MC&I
for forest management certification which will be used in assessing forest
management practices in all forest management units for the purpose of
certification under the NTCC's scheme, which is currently being developed.
8.5In this context, under the 7 criteria of ITTO, a total of 64 indicators,
202 activities and 171 standards of performance were formulated at the
national level; while 56 indicators, 176 activities and 154 standards of
performance were formulated for assessing sustainable forest management
at the forest management unit level. A sub-set of those formulated at the
forest management unit level was taken for forest management certification
purposes, comprising 53 indicators, 166 activities and 142 standards of
performance as shown in Appendix 7. Unless otherwise stated, this set applies
at the national and forest management unit levels, as well as for forest
management certification at the forest management unit level. Furthermore,
the standards of performance are for Peninsular Malaysia only.
8.6In the process of revising the MC&I, Malaysia has added the following
to the ITTO's indicators at both the national and forest management unit
levels:-
(i)an element on rights of forest workers to
the ITTO's Indicator 1.1 – Existences of framework of laws,
policies and regulations under Criterion 1 – Enabling
Conditions for Sustainable Forest Management;
(ii)an item on mortality rate to the ITTO's
Indicator 7.8 - Employment in the forestry sector under Criterion 7
– Socio-Economic Aspects; and
(iii)the words "and competency" to ITTO's
Indicator 1.5 – Number and adequacy of trained professional
and technical personnel at all levels to perform and support
management, implementation, research and extension also under Criterion
1 which now reads as Number, and adequacy and competency of trained
professional and technical personnel at all levels to perform and
support management, implementation, research and extension.
8.7Malaysia has also addressed the gender issue in the ITTO's Indicator
1.5 and Indicator 7.8 at both the national and forest management unit levels. Besides,
for Indicator 1.5, the information on Research and Extension will be recorded
separately instead of as one category as suggested by ITTO, again at both
the national and forest management unit levels.
8.8For the MC&I for sustainable forest management at the forest management
unit level and for forest management certification, Malaysia has also included
the following additional indicators/items from those proposed by ITTO at
the national level only to this level:-
(i)ITTO's Indicator 1.1 - Existence of a framework of laws, policies and regulations;
(ii)the item on the Bali Partnership Fund in
ITTO's Indicator 1.2 – Amount of investment and reinvestment
in forest management, administration, research and human resource
development;
(iii)ITTO's Indicator 5.1 - Statistics of protected areas in each forest type;
(iv)ITTO's Indicator 5.2 - Percentage of total
number of protected areas connected by biological corridors or
'stepping stones' between them;
(v)ITTO's Indicator 7.4 - Ratio of domestic log production to the processing capacity of wood-based industries;
(vi)the items on percentage of total work force
and average wage rate in ITTO's Indicator 7.8 – Employment in
the forestry sector; and
(vii)the items on research and education in ITTO's Indicator 7.9 – Number and extent of forest sites available.
8.9However, Malaysia has omitted two ITTO's indicators from the MC&I
at both the national and forest management unit levels, as well as for
forest management certification. These are as follows:-
(i)ITTO's Indicator 7.3 - Quantity (volume) and
value of wood and non-wood forest products for subsistence use,
including fuelwood, as the use of wood and non-wood forest products for
subsistence use is insignificant in Malaysia and has a very negligible
impact on its overall economy; and
(ii)ITTO's Indicator 7.18 - Number of
agreements involving local communities in co-management
responsibilities, as currently co-management agreements are not
practised in Malaysia, especially in forest harvesting;
8.10Moreover, Malaysia has also omitted 4 indicators/items at the forest
management unit level although they have been proposed by ITTO, and for
forest management certification as follows:-
(i)ITTO's Indicator 5.5 - Percentage of
original range occupied by selected endangered, rare and threatened
species, as this indicator is best reflected at the national level only
in view that the protection of selected endangered, rare and threatened
species is a national responsibility;
(ii)the item on ex situ conservation in
ITTO's Indicator 5.6 – Existence and implementation of a
strategy for in situ and/or ex situ conservation of the genetic
variation within commercial, endangered, rare and threatened species of
forest flora and fauna at the forest management level, as this is
deemed to be best covered and implemented at the national level;
(iii)ITTO's Indicator 7.2 - Quantity (volume)
and value of wood and non-wood forest products traded in the domestic
and international markets, as all relevant data on trade of wood and
non-wood forest products are collected at the national level; and
(iv)ITTO's Indicator 7.5 - Efficiency of
utilisation in terms of the percentage of felled volume processed, as
all relevant data are collected at the national level.
8.11 Although 3 indicators formulated for
assessing sustainable forest management at the forest management unit
level are currently not used for forest management certification, these
indicators will be taken on board once new knowledge is gained in their
application through more field-testing. These indicators are as
follows:-
(i)ITTO's Indicator 6.2 - Extent and percentage
of area to be harvested for which off-site catchment values have been
defined, documented and protected before harvesting;
(ii)ITTO's Indicator 6.4 - Extent and
percentage of area to be harvested for which drainage systems have been
demarcated or clearly defined and protected before harvesting; and
(iii)ITTO's Indicator 6.9 - Existence and
implementation of procedures for assessing changes in the water quality
of streams emerging from production forests as compared with streams
emerging from the same forest type kept free from human intervention.
8.12A summary of the number of criteria, indicators, activities and standards
of performance formulated for the different levels of management in the
revised MC&I is as shown in Appendix 8.
8.13Consequently, under the Malaysia-Netherlands certification arrangement,
action was taken to compare the revised MC&I with that of the Dutch
Minimum Requirements pertaining to the principles, criteria and indicators
for sustainable forest management at local level in December, 1999; although
similar exercises were undertaken in August, 1998 and June, 1999.
8.14It was observed that the MC&I exceeded in most instances the requirements
of the Dutch Minimum Requirements and that the two sets of standards are
comparable on a one-to-one basis with minimal adjustments. In fact, only
29 indicators together with 48 standards of performance under 6 criteria,
excluding the Criterion 3 – Forest Ecosystem Health and Condition,
of the MC&I were required to meet the Dutch Minimum Requirements for
timber certification as indicated in italics in Appendix 7. This revised
MC&I would be used to assess forest management practices in the states
of Johor, Kedah, Kelantan, Perak and Negeri Sembilan, and for the re-assessment
of the states of Selangor, Pahang and Terengganu under the Malaysia-Netherlands
timber certification arrangements.
9.0MONITORING AND EVALUATION
9.1In order to ensure that the agreed activities are implemented in the
field by the respective State Forestry Departments in Malaysia, a Task
Force comprising representatives from the Ministry of Primary Industries,
Malaysia; the Forestry Departments of Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak;
the Forest Research Institute, Malaysia; the Malaysian Timber Industry
Board; the Malaysian Timber Council and the Faculty of Forestry, University
Putra, Malaysia was established in May, 1995. To complement this effort,
Peninsular Malaysia had also formed a Technical Monitoring Committee at
the Forestry Department Headquarters, Peninsular Malaysia in October, 1995
to monitor the implementation of all the activities undertaken by the respective
State Forestry Departments in Peninsular Malaysia.
9.2The Task Force would develop an effective mechanism and procedures for
the periodic monitoring on the implementation of all the activities, and
produce reports on their progress to the higher authorities in Malaysia
for their information and further action.
9.3In this context, Malaysia is currently developing internal assessment
procedures and a computerized monitoring system for sustainable forest
management based on the MC&I. This is jointly being undertaken with
the support of the Deutche Gessellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit
(GTZ) of Germany and is expected to be fully operational in June, 2000.
10.0FUTURE ACTIONS
10.1As the long-term prospect of abundant supply of forest is limited and
technological innovations are inadequate, discrete and unpredictable, one
has to tailor development efforts judiciously so as not to sacrifice development
itself. In this regard, the future patterns of forest resource management
and use in Malaysia would have to be restructured by adopting strategies
of sustainable management which are innovative and imaginative through
enhanced human resources development, and treating environment as an integral
part of management in order to ensure that maximum economic and social
benefits are derived from managing this resource.
10.2 Moreover, recognizing that the
development of the forest resource itself is a continuous process which
involves intentional and planned changes to the environment through
various anthropogenic activities, it must, therefore, be accompanied by
conscious efforts in guiding these environmental changes so that the
sustenance of economic growth will serve the purpose of providing a
better standard and quality of life itself. These changes must be
undertaken through proper long-term management of the forest resource
by maintaining an optimum equilibrium between resource utilization and
the need to protect the environment as environmental stability is a
prerequisite for the sustainable production of forest goods and
services.
10.3In this connection, an Assessor Training Programme on Forest Certification
for Southeast Asian Countries, to be jointly organized by the NTCC and
the Smartwood Programme of the Rainforest Alliance with financial support
from GTZ, is scheduled to be held in Kuala Berang, Terengganu from 20-24
March, 2000. The objectives of this Training Programme are: first, to train
individual professionals to participate in forest management certification
teams; second, to raise the awareness and availability of the FSC certification
system in the region; and third, to foster the development of future certification
courses offered by the NTCC. A total of 20 personnel from countries such
as Indonesia, Vietnam and Malaysia will be trained in carrying out assessment
for the purpose of forest management certification. The MC&I will be
one of the documents used in this Training Programme.
10.4Other projects planned for this year include a MTIB/GTZ study on chain-of-custody
in timber certification. Drawing upon the experiences of the Malaysia-Netherlands
Pilot Study on timber certification, this project will expand the scope
to cover other timber products, such as builders' carpentary and joinery,
panel products and furniture, as well as timber products from plantation
forests.
10.5The other remaining states in Peninsular Malaysia, namely, Johor, Kedah,
Kelantan, Perak and Negeri Sembilan will also be assessed this year by
independent third party assessors using the revised MC&I, together
with the re-assessment of the states of Selangor, Pahang and Terengganu.
10.6The level of management will also be refined once the current silvicultural
management systems are further developed for application at a lower management
level, perhaps at the forest district level, forest reserve level or even
at the compartment level. In this connection, the GTZ project on Sustainable
Forest Management and Conservation in Peninsular Malaysia which is involved
in the refinement of the current forest management systems, the improvement
of silvicultural practices and the development of a cost-effective forest
planning system for application at the operational level would greatly
enhance this effort.
10.7The criteria and indicators developed for forest management certification
will also be reviewed and refined periodically to reflect new concepts
of sustainable forest management. These will be based on evolving knowledge
about the functioning of forest ecosystem, anthropogenic intervention on
the forests whether planned or unplanned and the changing needs of society
for forest goods and services. Besides, the capability to measure indicators
will increase and scientific knowledge will improve about the nature of
'best' indicators to measure sustainability of the forest resources.
11.CONCLUSIONS
11.1The criteria and indicators at the national level would provide a common
framework for monitoring and evaluating progress towards sustainability
at the national level. However, they do not specify requirements for sustainable
forest management practices in the field. In this context, the criteria
and indicators at the forest management unit level will assess directly
the sustainability of forest resource management, conservation and development
in practice. It should also be noted that no single criterion or indicator
is alone an indication of sustainability. Rather, the set of criteria and
indicators should be considered as an integral system to assess the practice
of sustainable forest management.
11.2Although timber certification has been recognized as a potential tool
to promote sustainable forest management, the efficacy of this tool is
still subjected to considerable debate at the international level. Moreover,
the use of trade instruments to pursue environmental objectives may increase
domestic resistance to external pressures devoted to fostering global environmental
concerns. Hence, a free trade policy coupled with incentives and not punitive
measures, as well as a supportive international economic climate that enhances
the sustained and environmentally sound development of all types of forest
should be promoted and encouraged.
11.3Nevertheless, the implementation of timber certification in Malaysia
is being actively pursued to ensure continued market access of Malaysian
timber products particularly in the environmentally sensitive market. In
this context, as timber certification is a consequence of sustainable forest
management, Malaysia had in 1997 created a "Green Award" for
the forest district that best managed its forest resources and in accordance
with the MC&I for sustainable forest management.
11.4As part of the programme to promote the MC&I, and recognizing the
important role played by the logging contractors towards its full implementation,
the Forestry Department, Peninsular Malaysia had organized three regional
seminars involving participants from the logging and wood-based industries
in March, May and August of 1997. The seminar highlighted the need for
sustainable forest management and the role and responsibilities of the
logging contractors and the wood-based industries in ensuring full implementation
of the MC&I.
11.5The key principles in ensuring sustainable forest management are that
ecological constraints must be considered early in any forest land development;
that the allocation of forests to other uses should be considered only
after thorough economic, social and ecological evaluation; that forest
should only be converted to other permanent non-forestry uses if it could
be demonstrated that this would produce sustainable benefits in a more
desirable form than the forest itself could produce; that wherever possible,
forest areas which are already degraded should be selected for non-forestry
uses rather than clearing yet more forest areas; and that special efforts
be taken to manage forest areas that are critical for the maintenance of
watersheds and in the conservation of biological diversity.
11.6While there is no denying that there are still some outstanding issues
unresolved, nevertheless, given the constraints, Malaysia has certainly
not been side-stepping conservation and environmental issues in managing
and developing its forest resource. This renewable asset will continue
to be managed in accordance with national objectives and priorities so
that the country will continue to enjoy the benefits generated from the
forest and forest industries.
11.7The long-term viability for the sound and sustainable development,
management and conservation of the forest resource in Malaysia will be
one that balances the needs of the economy, environment and ecology.
|
|||||||||||||||||